Update 'jas/02/25.md'
This commit is contained in:
parent
a909e1a8eb
commit
1397e2afc1
|
@ -4,14 +4,7 @@ James says that what was true of Abraham was also true of Rahab. Both were justi
|
|||
|
||||
# was not Rahab the prostitute justified by works ... another road?
|
||||
|
||||
James is using this rhetorical question to instruct his audience. Alternate translation: "it was what Rahab the prostitute did that justified her ... another road." (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/jit/figs-rquestion]] and [[rc://en/ta/man/jit/figs-activepassive]])
|
||||
|
||||
# was not Rahab the prostitute justified by works ... another road?
|
||||
This can be restated to remove the abstract noun "works." This can also be stated in active form. Alternate translation: "did God not justify Rahab the prostitute because of what she did ... another road?" or "God justified Rahab the prostitute because of what she did ... another road." (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/jit/figs-abstractnouns]] and [[rc://en/ta/man/jit/figs-activepassive]])
|
||||
|
||||
# Rahab the prostitute
|
||||
|
||||
James expects his audience to know the Old Testament story about the woman Rahab.
|
||||
"it was what Rahab the prostitute did that justified her ... another road." or "did God not justify Rahab the prostitute because of what she did ... another road?" or "God justified Rahab the prostitute because of what she did ... another road." James expects his audience to know the Old Testament story about the woman Rahab.
|
||||
|
||||
# messengers
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue